Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 00:34
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Get Ready for More Commercials in Movie Theaters - The Hollywood Reporter
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Week in Review: Meta reveals its Oakley smart glasses - TechCrunch
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What are the reasons behind China and Russia's reluctance to integrate into the global economy?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
3 Observations: Running Against the Wind; Isaiah Rodgers Nabs Interception - Minnesota Vikings
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What are some cool examples of two kinds of people?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.